English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Received opinion has it that the Paracelsian movement in England did not rise much above the level of quackery before the seventeenth century. This view, represented by Allen G. Debus and Paul H. Kocher, is based on the apparent lack of contemporary critical debate of Paracelsian theory; there was, they suggest, a limited tolerance of chemical therapy, but little interest in the underlying challenge to traditional Galenism.' But Charles Webster has claimed that the only full-length Paracelsian apologia in English, Richard Bostocke's Difference between the auncient physicke and the latter physicke (1585), was not an isolated effusion but a sign of

Sleepers awake: Thomas Moffet's challenge to the College of Physicians of London, 1584