English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

2018 data from the Canadian Medical Association website shows that of practicing emergency physicians country-wide, only 31% were female. While there are some studies that examine the number and proportion of Canadian female applicants applying to surgical specialties, there are very few studies that are specific to emergency medicine (EM), and none that are Canadian in scope. Given the changing gender ratio of graduating medical students in Canada, the primary objective of this study is to assess the mean proportion and trends in proportion of females who applied and matched to English-language Canadian EM programs including Canadian College of Family Physicians emergency medicine certificate (CCFP-EM) and Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of Canada emergency medicine (FRCPC-EM), family medicine (CCFP) programs, and all specialties combined.  Methods:  A retrospective data analysis on residency match results from 2013-2019 inclusively was performed. Data was accessed through a freedom of information request from the Canadian resident matching service (CaRMS). The mean proportions and trends in the proportions of females applying and matching to CCFP-EM, FRCPC-EM, CCFP, and all specialties were computed. Cochrane-Armitage trend of test was used for analysis.  Results:  From 2013-2019, the mean (SD) percentage of females who applied and matched respectively were as follows: CCFP-EM [44.4 (3.5);46.0(4.5)]; FRCPC-EM [41.3(4.1);44.0 (4.5], CCFP [56.5(1.3);61.0(1.9)], all specialties [54.0(1.1);55.5(0.9)]. There was a significant increase in the proportion of female applying to the FRCPC-EM (p &lt; 0.0001), CCFP (p = 0.0002), and all disciplines (p = 0.0013). There was no significant change in the proportion of females applying for the CCFP-EM program (p = 0.6435).  Conclusion:  Our study shows that there is an increasing trend in the percentage of female applicants in all programs except the CCFP-EM program, where it remained statistically the same over time. There was a consistent percentage of applied versus matched female applicants over time for both CCFP-EM and FRCPC-EM programs. However, the percentage of females applying or matching to both CCFP-EM and FRCPC-EM programs remained less than 50%. Further research could focus on evaluating reasons for program choice, in order to further increase the percentage of female medical students and residents applying and matching to both emergency medicine programs.

LO73: Are women under-represented in emergency medicine residency programs across Canada?