English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a fundamental intervention for cardiac arrest, yet health care providers rarely adhere to recommended guidelines. Real-time feedback improves CPR performance. It is currently unknown how Canadian emergency physicians assess CPR quality during cardiac arrest and if they use feedback devices. Our aim was to describe how emergency physicians assess CPR quality and to describe eventual barriers to implementation of feedback technology.    Methods  This was a cross-sectional survey that was distributed to attending and resident emergency physicians through the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Responses were summarized and analyzed using descriptive statistics.    Results  The response rate was 19% (323/1735). Visual observation was the most common method of assessing CPR quality (41.2%), with leaders standing at the foot of the bed (67.4%). This was followed by real-time pulse check (29.7%) and end-tidal CO 2  values (21.7%). Only 12% of physicians utilized CPR feedback technology. The most common perceived barrier to utilization was unavailability, inexperience with devices and lack of guidelines/evidence for their use.    Conclusion  Most Canadian emergency physicians that responded to our survey, assess quality of CPR by standing at the foot of the bed and utilize visual observation and palpation methods which are known to be inaccurate. A minority utilize objective measurements such as ETCO 2  or feedback devices, with the greatest barrier being lack of availability.

How is quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation being assessed? A national survey of Canadian emergency medicine physicians