English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Patients in our ED were dissatisfied with their waiting experience, which resulted in patient anxiety and complaints. In 8 months, we aimed to (1) improve patient satisfaction with the ED waiting experience from triage to physician initial assessment by a 15% improvement in patients who rate their experience very good/excellent on a Likert Scale, and (2) improve patient knowledge of ED wait time by a 50% increase in understanding on a Likert Scale.  Methods:  We co-designed a display with ED patients to notify those in the waiting room of their wait process and wait time. The intervention was selected after root cause diagnostics including: Fishbone exercise, Pareto Diagram, and Driver Diagram. The display was co-designed with ED patients and improved via PDSA cycles to establish information displayed and how to incorporate it into the waiting experience. After co-design, a low-fidelity display was piloted in the waiting room.  Results:  A family of measures were evaluated using patient/provider surveys and hospital data metrics. Outcome measures were (1) percentage of patients who rated their ED experience as very good/excellent on a Likert scale, and (2) patients who had a clear/very clear understanding of their wait time on a Likert scale. Process measures were the percentage of patients who (1) looked at the wait time display, and (2) felt they could communicate their wait time to others. Balancing measures were clerk/nurse satisfaction and self-reported interruptions of patients asking wait time. Outcomes were tracked using statistical process charts and run charts. Following display implementation, patient rating of their ED experience and patient understanding of wait time showed positive improvement. Clerks/nurses were also more satisfied with their jobs and self-reported interruptions decreased.  Conclusion:  A low-fidelity wait time display co-designed with patients improved patient satisfaction and understanding of ED wait times. We plan to develop an automated electronic display that resembles the low-fidelity display and evaluate the impact of the intervention on the established measures. This intervention has the potential to be sustainable, feasible for other EDs, and require minimal upkeep costs.

MP27: Publishing emergency department wait times in the waiting room: implementation and evaluation of a co-designed patient centered solution