English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Dental complaints and emergencies are a common emergency department (ED) issue that has not been extensively studied. This study aimed to provide an evaluation of Canadian practice patterns and clinical training relating to dental emergencies in the ED.  Methods:  We conducted an electronic survey inviting 1520 Canadian emergency medicine (EM) physicians from CAEP’s physician distribution network. Thirty-three questions were asked regarding ED physician training with dental emergencies, practice patterns and comfort with dental care, current available ED dental resources, and how dental care may be improved in Canadian EDs. Standard descriptive statistics were calculated.  Results:  Survey response rate was 15.1%. Respondents were predominantly male (62.8%) with a mean 15.3 years (SD: ±9.8) of practice, and were primarily CCFP-EM (50.7%) or FRCP-trained (25.6%) in either tertiary (48.0%) or community (36.3%) teaching hospitals. They received broad training on dental issues, but this was limited in scope to ≤1 day of residency (61.4%). A combined majority (59.6%) felt their residency left them somewhat to very unprepared for treating dental complaints, and &amp;lt;40% of physicians reported feeling comfortable with specific, common dental emergency procedures, with the exception of avulsed tooth storage (61.1%). For pain management and local trauma exploration, 36.9% felt somewhat to very uncomfortable performing oral and facial nerve blocks. Many respondents do not have access to any dental emergency supplies (48.0%), or do not know if they have any access (14.2%). Furthermore, 18.9% have no access to any professional support for help with dental emergencies requiring advanced management. Respondents believe dental emergency consultant support is an issue at their centre (62.5%). EM physicians want more training with dental emergencies (79.5%) and improved access to dental-specific emergency materials in their departments (63.7%). The greatest barriers to providing good ED dental care were cost to patients (72.7%), physician comfort treating complaints (54.7%), and clear follow-up with outpatient dental professionals (54.3%).  Conclusion:  ED physicians feel relatively unprepared by their residency training to treat dental complaints, and professional dental support is an issue in the majority of EDs. Dental care may be improved with more access to training, to dental ED resources and professional support.

P085: Dental complaints in the emergency department: a national survey of Canadian EM physicians