English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Maxillary height is an understudied etiological factor of malocclusions since most of the research on the maxilla has been carried out in the sagittal plane. The objective of this research was to assess if there are differences in maxillary height between patients without malocclusion and with malocclusion in a population from Nayarit.Material and methodsThe size of the sample was 180 lateral X-rays; 45 were of patients without malocclusion so 45 X-rays of each Angle malocclusion were chosen randomly. Descriptive statistics and the ANOVA test were performed in the program SPSS version 18.ResultsPatients without malocclusion had a difference of 0.5° with respect to the standard of Ricketts, class II malocclusion was the most altered value of maxillary height and Angle class III malocclusion was the one that was closest to the Ricketts standard.ConclusionThere are statistical significant differences in maxillary height between malocclusions

Differences in maxillary height in patients with maloclussion versus patients without maloclussion