English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Sustainable development indicators are now considered as one of the most important aspect to implement a sustainable development policy in our countries. Experiences are launched in France, at national or regional level. If discussions first dealed with the definition of a suitable check-list of indicators, this paper suggests that procedure leading to appropriate indicators is of great importance. Both from theoretical and operationnal points of view, the development of indicators system should rely on the demand from actors involved in development projects. This means that building indicators of sustainable development needs a procedure which is supposed to traduce the principles of sustainability in a form that fits the motivations of the different actors concerned. A procedure is here proposed to ensure this aim of indicators contextualisation. It is based on partenarial processus oriented to the proposition of indicators built as decision criterias for the different actors. Then, these theorical indicators must be compared to the available datas, and an iterative step is done to define sustainable development indicators and index. This method ensure the legitimity of the outputs of such a decision tool by giving a social and political validation to the indicators produced. The conclusion of the paper put the attention on the difficulty to find a balance between, on one hand the normative aspects of the sustainable development notion and on the other hand the need to fit with the actual decision context of the actors concerned by the information system on sustainability. We can recognize here the paradoxal aspect of the sustainable developement that engages the countries to apply partenarial and democratical procedures and, in the same time, implies normative options of development.

Lénjeu des indicateurs du développement durable. Mobiliser des besoins pour concrétiser des principes