English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To determine: (1) whether the apparent lack of efficacy of dopamine D1 (D1) antagonists in the clinic might be attributable to development of tolerance to antipsychotic effects; and (2) whether combined D1 and D2 antagonism might contribute to clozapine's clinical profile, eight Cebus apella monkeys were chronically treated with a D1 antagonist (NNC 756) ((+)-8-chloro-7-hydroxy-3-methyl-5-(7-(2,3- dihydrobenzofuranyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), a D2 antagonist (raclopride) or a combination of the two antagonists. Prior neuroleptic exposure had resulted in oral dyskinesia in seven monkeys and sensitization to dystonia in all, yielding a model for acute and chronic extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). Dextroamphetamine-induced motoric unrest and stereotypies were used as a psychosis model. We found tolerance toward dystonic symptoms during D1 and D1 + D2 treatments but not during D2 treatment. D2 but not D1 or D1 + D2 antagonism caused exacerbation of dyskinesia. Both D1 and D1 + D2 antagonism were superior to D2 antagonism alone in counteracting the amphetamine-induced behaviors, with no tolerance to antiamphetamine effects. These findings suggest: (1) reasons other than tolerance (e.g., differences among antagonists) may explain the lack of efficacy in clinical trials with D1 antagonists; and (2) that D1 antagonism alone or combined and modest D1 and D2 antagonism offers the potential of antipsychotic efficacy with a lower risk of EPS than traditional D2 antagonism. Further clinical trials with D1 or combined D1 and D2 antagonists are, therefore, recommended.

neuropsychopharmacology

Chronic Dopamine D1, Dopamine D2 and Combined Dopamine D1 and D2 Antagonist Treatment in Cebus Apella Monkeys Antiamphetamine Effects and Extrapyramidal Side Effects