English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

PURPOSEWe hypothesized that combined methylation analysis of Wnt antagonist genes could serve as a panel of biomarkers for diagnosis, staging, and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNSamples (n = 62) of RCC and corresponding normal renal tissue (NRT) were analyzed using methylation-specific PCR for methylation of six Wnt antagonist genes (sFRP-1, sFRP-2, sFRP-4, sFRP-5, Wif-1, and Dkk-3). To increase the sensitivity/specificity of RCC detection, the methylation score (M score) for multigene methylation analysis was developed. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal sensitivity/specificity of the M score. In addition, the M score was compared with the clinicopathologic outcome. Thirty-three serum DNA samples were also used to investigate the methylation status of Wnt antagonist genes.RESULTSThe methylation levels of all Wnt antagonists were significantly higher in RCC than in NRT. In multivariate regression analysis, the methylation level of sFRP-1 was a significant independent predictor of RCC, whereas for sFRP-2 and sFRP-4 there was a trend toward significance as independent predictors. The M score of Wnt antagonist genes was significantly higher in RCC than in NRT. Overall, the M score had a sensitivity of 79.0% and a specificity of 75.8% (area under the curve, 0.808) as a diagnostic biomarker. In addition, the M score could significantly distinguish grade, pT category, M category, and overall survival of RCC patients. The M score was independent of age and gender in predicting overall survival by the Cox proportional hazards model. In RCC patients, 72.7% of the methylation-specific PCR results had identical methylation in samples of tumor and serum DNA. No serum DNA in normal controls showed aberrant methylation of the Wnt antagonist genes. In addition, the methylation status of Wnt antagonist genes in serum DNA was significantly correlated with tumor grade and stage.CONCLUSIONSThis is the first report showing that M score analysis of Wnt antagonist genes can serve as an excellent epigenetic biomarker panel for detection, staging, and prognosis of RCC using serum DNA.

211: Wnt-antagonist Family Genes as Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Staging and Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma using Tumor and Serum DNA