English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

According to the Corruption Perceptions Index, computed by Transparency International for 2011, Romania is on the 75-th place from 183 analyzed countries, with a score of 3.6 from 10 (in European Union, it is on the 25-th place from 27 states, being surpassed by Bulgaria and Greece). On the same basis, Global Corruption Barometer offers other worrying data for 2010: business environment/private sector is perceived as a corrupt one (a score of 3.6 from 5); only 2% of the respondents trust the business environment/private sector. In these conditions, present cannot offer many ethical models, especially from business. Worse, neither tradition seems more generous, two examples being relevant in supporting this assertion: in Romania, outlaw (in fact, a form of theft) was excessively overrated as a myth; in popular culture, there can be found elements being expression of some collective character flaws (see the Romanian proverb “Uncaught thief honest merchant.”). On this background, the following questions arise: How can we teach business ethics to students living in such a society? How can we convince students of the relevance/utility of business ethics issues, when around them, things happen totally different?Trying to answer these questions, present article aims to investigate how anti-models can be used to build, over time, some valid models

Crisis of National Ethical Models – Implications on Learning Business Ethics in Romanian Universities