English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The paper proposes a comparative analysis of random utility models and fuzzy logic models for representing gap-acceptance behavior at priority intersections, based on data collected from driving simulator tests. Explanatory variables not detectable from on site observations were observed in the experiments. The proposed models include driving styles variables in addition to variables commonly used in gap-acceptance studies. The driving tests have been conducted using STSoftware® fixed-base driving simulator. The comparison between the two kinds of models, performed using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, indicates that fuzzy models can be considered an alternative to the use of random utility models. Furthermore the ability of driving simulators to provide data not detectable from direct observations is highlighted

procedia - social and behavioral sciences

Comparative Analysis of Random Utility Models and Fuzzy Logic Models for Representing Gap-Acceptance Behavior Using Data from Driving Simulator Experiments