English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

We comment on a technical critique of the free energy principle in linearsystems by Aguilera, Millidge, Tschantz, and Buckley, entitled "How Particularis the Physics of the Free Energy Principle?" Aguilera and colleagues identifyan ambiguity in the flow of the mode of a system, and we discuss the contextfor this ambiguity in earlier papers, and their proposal of a more adequateinterpretation of these equations. Following that, we discuss amisinterpretation in their treatment of surprisal and variational free energy,especially with respect to their gradients and their minima. In sum, we arguethat the results in the target paper are accurate and stand up to rigorousscrutiny; we also highlight that they, nonetheless, do not undermine the FEP.

physics of life reviews

Some Minimal Notes on Notation and Minima: A Comment on "How Particular  is the Physics of the Free Energy Principle?" by Aguilera, Millidge,  Tschantz, and Buckley