English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

An interesting controversy has emerged challenging the widely accepted natureof the $X(3915)$ and the $X(3930)$ resonances, which had initially beenassigned to the $\chi_{c0}(2P)$ and $\chi_{c2}(2P)$ $c\bar c$ states,respectively. To unveil their inner structure, the properties of the$J^{PC}\!\!=\!0^{++}$ and $J^{PC}\!\!=\!2^{++}$ charmonium states in the energyregion of these resonances are analyzed in the framework of a constituent quarkmodel. Together with the bare $q\bar q$ states, threshold effects due to theopening of nearby meson-meson channels are included in a coupled-channelsscheme calculation. We find that the structure of both states is dominantlymolecular with a probability of bare $q\bar q$ states lower than $45\%$. Ourresults favor the hypothesis that $X(3915)$ and $X(3930)$ resonances arise asdifferent decay mechanisms of the same $J^{PC}\!\!=\!2^{++}$ state. Moreover wefound an explanation for the recently discovered $M=3860$ MeV$/c^2$ as a$J^{PC}\!\!=\!0^{++}$ $2P$ state and rediscovery the lost $Y(3940)$ as anadditional state in the $J^{PC}\!\!=\!0^{++}$ family.

Charmonium resonances in the 3.9 GeV/$c^2$ energy region and the $X(3915)/X(3930)$ puzzle