English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We analyze the data distributions $f(h)$, $f(N_c$) and $f(N_p)$ of the Hirschindex $(h)$, total citations ($N_c$) and total number of papers ($N_p$) of thetop scoring 120,000 authors (scientists) from the Stanford cite-score (orc-score) 2022 list and their corresponding $h$ ($3 \le h \le 284$), $N_c (1009\le N_c \le 428620$) and $N_p$ ($3\le N_p \le 3791$) statistics from the Scopusdata. For reasons explained in the text, we divided the data of these topscorers (c-scores in the range 5.6125 to 3.3461) into six successiveequal-sized Groups of 20,000 authors or scientists. We tried to fit, in eachGroup, $f(h)$, $f(Nc)$ and $f(Np)$ with Gamma distributions, viewing them asthe ``wealth distributions'' in the fixed saving-propensity kinetic exchangemodels and found $f(h) \sim h^{\gamma_h} \mathrm{exp} (-h/T_h)$ with fittingnoise level or temperature level ($T_h$) and average value of $h$, and thepower $\gamma_h$ determined by the ``citation saving propensity'' in eachGroup. We further showed that using some earlier proposed power law scalinglike $h = D_c N_c^{\alpha_c}$ (or $h = D_p N_p^{\alpha_p}$) with $\alpha_c =1/2 = \alpha_p$, we can derive the observed $f(h)$ from the observed $f(N_c)$or $f(N_p)$, with $D_c = 0.5$, but $D_p$ depending on the Group considered.This observation suggests that the average citations per paper ($N_c/N_p$) ineach group ($= (D_p/D_c)^2 =4D_p^2$) vary (from 58 to 29) with the c-scorerange of the six Groups considered here, implying different effectiveDunbar-like coordination numbers of the scientists belonging to differentgroups or networks.

Scaling and Kinetic Exchange Like Behavior of Hirsch Index and Total Citation Distributions: Scopus-CiteScore Data Analysis