English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

We propose and compare six different ways of mapping the modified $q$-votermodel to complex networks. Considering square lattices, Barab\'asi-Albert,Watts-Strogatz and real Twitter networks, we ask the question if always aparticular choice of the group of influence of a fixed size $q$ leads todifferent behavior at the macroscopic level. Using Monte Carlo simulations weshow that the answer depends on the relative average path length of the networkand for real-life topologies the differences between the considered mappingsmay be negligible.

Mapping the $q$-voter model: From a single chain to complex networks