English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

As we know, there is a belief in the finance literature that Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) are new approaches to manage and control the risk. Regard to, value at risk is not a coherent risk measure and it is not sub-additive and convex, so, we have considered conditional value at risk as a risk measure by different confidence level in the Mean-CVaR and multi objective proportional change Mean-CVaR models and compared these models with our previous mean-VaR models. This paper focuses on the performance evaluation process and portfolios selection by using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Conventional DEA models assume non-negative values for inputs and outputs, but many of data take the negative value. Therefore, we have used our models based on Range Directional Measure (RDM) that can take positive and negative values. Here value at risk is obtained by non-parametric methods such as historical simulation and Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, a numerical example in Iran's market is presented. Keywords: Portfolio, Data Envelopment Analysis, Negative data, Value at risk, Conditional value at risk, Efficienc

Portfolio performance evaluation in Mean-CVaR framework: A comparison with non-parametric methods value at risk in Mean-VaR analysis