English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Gene editing based on homology-directed repair (HDR) depends on donor DNA templates and programmable nucleases, e.g., RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases. However, next to inducing HDR involving the mending of chromosomal double-stranded breaks (DSBs) with donor DNA substrates, programmable nucleases also yield gene disruptions, triggered by competing non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways. It is, therefore, imperative to identify parameters underlying the relationship between these two outcomes in the context of HDR-based gene editing. Here we implemented quantitative cellular systems, based on epigenetically regulated isogenic target sequences and donor DNA of viral, non-viral, and synthetic origins, to investigate gene-editing outcomes resulting from the interaction between different chromatin conformations and donor DNA structures. We report that, despite a significantly higher prevalence of NHEJ-derived events at euchromatin over Krüppel-associated box (KRAB)-impinged heterochromatin, HDR frequencies are instead generally less impacted by these alternative chromatin conformations. Hence, HDR increases in relation to NHEJ when open euchromatic target sequences acquire a closed heterochromatic state, with donor DNA structures determining, to some extent, the degree of this relative increase in HDR events at heterochromatin. Finally, restricting nuclease activity to HDR-permissive G2 and S phases of the cell cycle through a Cas9-Geminin construct yields lower, hence more favorable, NHEJ to HDR ratios, independently of the chromatin structure.

The Chromatin Structure of CRISPR-Cas9 Target DNA Controls the Balance between Mutagenic and Homology-Directed Gene-Editing Events