English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

In this proceeding we will show that the expectations of the isobaric$^{96}_{44}\mathrm{Ru}+^{96}_{44}\mathrm{Ru}$ and$^{96}_{40}\mathrm{Zr}+^{96}_{40}\mathrm{Zr}$ collisions on chiral magneticeffect (CME) search may not hold as originally anticipated due to largeuncertainties in the isobaric nuclear structures. We demonstrate this usingWoods-Saxon densities and the proton and neutron densities calculated by thedensity functional theory. Furthermore, a novel method is proposed to gaugebackground and possible CME contributions in the same system, intrinsicallybetter than the isobaric collisions of two different systems. We illustrate themethod with Monte Carlo Glauber and AMPT (A Multi-Phase Transport) simulations.

Re-examining the premise of isobaric collisions and a novel method to measure the chiral magnetic effect