English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To compile this paper we used the research technique of content analysis of text material. Relevant sources were found on the scientific databases (EBSCO, ProQuest, Pubmed, Science Direct, Scopus and the like; the authors analyzed 45 foreign sources published from 2016 until the present day). The authors propose to offer a theoretical comparative synthesis (exploring sociotherapy in its totality and in terms of the interrelatedness of its particular segments) of sociotherapy definitions (in terms of social therapy in social work, social support, and social treatment) trying to determine some concrete aspects which point out to some commonalities or differences between these definitions. The basic methodological concept of comparative synthesis within the theoretical–methodological, legislative and territorial framework is defined by the following aspects (these were also used as keywords in the search boxes of the above-mentioned scientific databases): activation of the client's social potential, placing emphasis on the client's relationship to his or her environment, the client's environment itself, the client in his or her environment, and a therapeutic relationship. This issue presents a challenge for scholars in the field of social research and for the further professional practice.

(Socio)therapy in social work - Ambiguous theoretical concept