English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Study design, materials and methods: A prospectively maintained, institutional review board approved, database of consecutive non-neurogenic women who underwent SSR for MUS complications and were followed for 6 months minimum was reviewed. Exclusion criteria included women with existing vaginal mesh in place, those who underwent concomitant vaginal mesh removal or concomitant surgery, or had 2 MUS removed. All MUS excisions were performed vaginally under general anaesthesia with the aim of removing as much MUS as possible. [1] Indications for SSR and outcomes at the last visit were classified based on patient self-reporting.

S&T-41 IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN OUTCOME BETWEEN EARLY VERSUS DELAYED REMOVAL OF SUBURETHRAL MID-URETHRAL SLING?