English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

There have been several case reports, retrospective series, and registry data describing treatment of patients with traumatic aortic rupture (TAR) using endovascular stents (ES). Most are single-center studies with a limited number of patients. Few studies compare conventional surgical repair (SR) with ES. We performed a systematic review of these studies in an attempt to quantify the benefits of ES for TAR.

Open versus endovascular repair of traumatic aortic rupture: A systematic review