English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The results of studies measuring the number of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in normal pregnancies and in preeclampsia have been highly controversial or even contradictory because of cross-sectional designs and different methodologies enumerating three distinct subsets of EPCs: circulating angiogenic cells (CAC), colony-forming unit endothelial cell (CFU-ECs), and endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs). To provide a clear explanation for these underlying controversies, we designed a prospective study to compare the number of all EPC subsets between three trimesters of normal gestation and a case-control study to compare these values as preeclampsia occurs with those from gestational age (GA) matched normal pregnancy.

Changes in endothelial progenitor cell subsets in normal pregnancy compared with preeclampsia