English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Information systems are cornerstones of modern organizations. They not only support business processes but can also provide a strategic advantage. As a result Business/IT Alignment becomes essential and is generally supported by Enterprise Architecture based approaches. These approaches generally provide top-down “execution strategy” processes whereas the Strategic Alignment Model (SAM) provides alternative processes. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to compare the TOGAF ADM (Architecture Development Method) with alignment processes underlying the SAM. First, the SAM underlying processes are formalized in the form of basic operations. Second, mappings between the SAM and TOGAF ADM are provided in order to compare both alignment processes. On this basis, the limits of the TOGAF ADM are outlined.

Insight from a comparison of TOGAF ADM and SAM alignment processes