English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

A comparison of robust flutter analyses within the µ framework is presented. The chosen test bed is the typical section with unsteady aerodynamic loads, which enables basic modeling features to be captured and so extend the gained knowledge to practical problems treated with modern techniques. The two main approaches to pose the LFT problem are investigated and features such as numerical accuracy and physical uncertainty description are assessed. A criterion is proposed to correlate the families of plants originated by the uncertainty description of the aerodynamic operator when different approximation algorithms are employed.

ifac-papersonline

Comparison of Aeroelastic Modeling and Robust Flutter Analysis of a Typical Section**This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 636307, project FLEXOP