English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Methodologies for the basin-scale evaluation of industrial-scale CO2 geological storage in saline aquifers can include the use of analytical tools, generic reservoir simulations, as well as basin-specific flow modelling studies. The selection of appropriate tools is dependent on the scale of investigation. Comparison of the results from these methods for the assessment of basin-scale CO2 geological storage in the Gippsland and Otway basins in Australia suggests that, at this scale, a combination of analytical tools in the form of equations for calculating injection pressure, radius of impact and storage capacity with generic numerical simulations may provide useful first-order predictions for storage capacity and injectivity. However, the development of multiple resources (petroleum, groundwater, coal) in the Gippsland Basin and regional compartmentalisation in the Otway Basin necessitates an additional, coarsely discretised basin-scale numerical model

energy procedia

Assessment of CO2 storage capacity and injectivity in saline aquifers – comparison of results from numerical flow simulations, analytical and generic models