English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

We perform null tests of the concordance model, using $H(z)$ measurementsthat mimic next-generation surveys such as Euclid and the SKA. To this end, wedeploy a non-parametric method, so that we make minimal assumptions about thefiducial cosmology as well as the statistical analysis. We produce simulationsassuming different cosmological models in order to verify how well we candistinguish between their signatures. We find that SKA- and Euclid-like surveysshould be able to discriminate sharply between the concordance and alternativedark energy models that are compatible with the Planck CMB data. We concludethat SKA and Euclid will be able to falsify the concordance model in astatistically significant way, if one of the benchmarks models represents thetrue Universe, without making assumptions about the underlying cosmology.

Null tests of the concordance model in the era of Euclid and the SKA