English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

We use three different data sets, specifically $H(z)$ measurements fromcosmic chronometers, the HII-galaxy Hubble diagram, and reconstructedquasar-core angular-size measurements, to perform a joint analysis of threeflat cosmological models: the $R_{\rm h}=ct$ Universe, $\Lambda$CDM, and$w$CDM. For $R_{\rm h}=ct$, the 1$\sigma$ best-fit value of the Hubble constant$H_0$ is $62.336\pm1.464$ $\mathrm{km \ s^{-1} \ Mpc^{-1}}$, which matchesprevious measurements ($\sim 63$ $\mathrm{km \ s^{-1} \ Mpc^{-1}}$) based onbest fits to individual data sets. For $\Lambda$CDM, our inferred value of theHubble constant, $H_0=67.013\pm2.578$ $\mathrm{km \ s^{-1} \ Mpc^{-1}}$, ismore consistent with the ${\it Planck}$ optimization than the locally measuredvalue using $\mbox{Cepheid}$ variables, and the matter density $\Omega_{\rmm}=0.347\pm0.049$ similarly coincides with its ${\it Planck}$ value to within1$\sigma$. For $w$CDM, the optimized parameters are $H_0=64.718\pm3.088$$\mathrm{km \ s^{-1} \ Mpc^{-1}}$, $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.247\pm0.108$ and$w=-0.693\pm0.276$, also consistent with ${\it Planck}$. A direct comparison ofthese three models using the Bayesian Information Criterion shows that the$R_{\rm h}=ct$ universe is favored by the joint analysis with a likelihood of$\sim 97\%$ versus $\lesssim 3\%$ for the other two cosmologies.

Testing the $R_{\rm h}=ct$ Universe Jointly with the Redshift-dependent Expansion rate and Angular-diameter and Luminosity Distances