English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Citation of the various papers published in one and the same journal is highly skewed. Journals with a high impact factor obtain this high value by frequent citation of only a limited number of their papers and, on the other hand, journals with low impact factors publish many papers that remain uncited [1]. Thus, mere publication of a paper in a given journal cannot be regarded as a quality marker of that particular paper [2], it just means that the authors have ‘succeeded in surviving’ the review process of that journal. Seglen [3] has analyzed that 50% of the obtained citations are accumulated by only 15% of the contents of a journal. In addition, the most frequently cited 50% of the contents obtain almost all citations (90%). These numbers were based on an analysis of three biochemical journals ( Biochimica Biophysica Acta , Biochemical Journal and Journal of Biochemical Chemistry ) and have later been confirmed for two cardiovascular journals ( Circulation Research and Cardiovascular Research ) [4]. Both analyses applied to recently published papers [3,4]. It is not known whether these data vary over time and whether or not they depend on impact itself.We have analyzed the original research papers of Cardiovascular Research published between 1992 and 2000 ( n = 1886). We have taken advantage from the fact that the impact factor of Cardiovascular Research increased from 1.47 in 1991 to 4.69 in 2002. This allowed us to relate the skewness of citations both to the time since publication and to impact. Thus, for year 1 (the calendar year of publication itself), we had nine sets of data (contents of 1992 as cited in 1992 through contents of 2000 as cited in 2000). For year 2 (the calendar year following the year of publication), we also had nine … *Corresponding author. Tel.: +31-30-2538900; fax: +31-30-2539036. t.opthof{at}med.uu.nl

Impact factors: no totum pro parte by skewness of citation