English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

ResumenEl objetivo de este trabajo es contrastar la validez (factorial y de criterio) y fiabilidad (en términos de consistencia interna) del Cuestionario de cibervictimización (CBV), un autoinforme diseñado para medir en adolescentes en qué medida el informante es víctima de agresiones a través del teléfono móvil o Internet. Para ello, se aplicó el CBV a 2.490 estudiantes de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria de Asturias (España), junto con el Cuestionario de factores de riesgo para la cibervictimización (FRC). Los resultados obtenidos muestran, con respecto a la validez factorial, que tanto el modelo unifactorial como los modelos multifactoriales puestos a prueba mediante análisis factoriales confirmatorios representan de manera adecuada la estructura interna del CBV. No obstante, el modelo de un factor resulta preferible por ser más parsimonioso. Respecto a la validez de criterio, la puntuación en el CBV correlaciona de manera estadísticamente significativa con los seis criterios externos evaluados con el cuestionario FRC, con los que la evidencia empírica previa indica que correlaciona la cibervictimización. Respecto a la fiabilidad, el CBV presenta una adecuada consistencia interna (α=0,85). Por todo ello, se concluye que el CBV es una herramienta adecuada para medir cibervictimización en estudiantes de Secundaria.AbstractThis aim of this study was to investigate psychometric properties of the Cybervictimization questionnaire (CBV), a self-report questionnaire designed to assess if adolescent have been the victim of aggression through a mobile phone or Internet. To test the factorial validity and criterion validity, and the internal consistency of the questionnaire, a sample of 2,490 students from Secondary Compulsory Education participated in this study. The students responded to the CBV and the Risk Factors Questionnaire for Cybervictimization (FRC). Confirmatory factor analyses were performed for investigation of the factor structure of the scale. The results show that both models tested, the one-factor model and multifactor-model, adequately represent the internal structure of the CBV. However, to be more parsimonious, the one-factor model is preferable. For criterion-related validity, the correlation between the CBV and the FRC was calculated. As a result of this, a signicant correlation was found between CBV score and the six external criteria evaluated in the FRC questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency reliability of CBV was 0.85. These results demonstrate that the CBV is a valid and reliable tool to assess victimization in Secondary Compulsory Education students

Validez y fiabilidad del Cuestionario de cibervictimización en estudiantes de Secundaria