English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study provides information on the interrater reliability of the quantitative scoring system of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery Form II (LNNB-II). The accuracy of each rater following a training procedure was also evaluated. Six college students served as raters, and participated in a 20-22-hour training procedure. This training procedure utilized a protocol similar to one used in previous interrater reliability studies performed with Form I. Following the training procedure, raters were asked to score two videotaped LNNB-II administrations in which a confederate portrayed test performance that was relatively straightforward to score, as well as more ambiguous test performance. Excellent interrater agreement and accuracy were found on the quantitative scoring on both tapes. Implications for training in administration and scoring are discussed.

An interrater reliability study of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery Form-II quantitative scoring system