English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The National Library of Medicine, USA (NLM) has a long-standing tradition of providing access to information in the biomedical literature [1]. One of the ways NLM assists users is to add subsequent notices of and/or linkages between citations for errata, retractions, partial retractions, corrected and republished articles, duplicate publications, comments (including author replies and expressions of concern), updated versions of articles, patient summaries, and republished (reprinted) articles indexed and available in NLM’s online MEDLINE database. Users who search MEDLINE will be informed if they retrieved a citation for an article that has been corrected by an erratum notice, retracted or partially retracted, corrected and republished; been found to duplicate another article; generated a separately published commenting article; been updated by a subsequent article; and if a summary for patients has been published, or has been republished (reprinted) in another journal.  The incidence of literature corrections, whether in the form of errata or retractions, in medical research is low, but the numbers have been increasing [2–4]. Whether the increased incidence is the outcome of heightened awareness, easier detection and notice of corrections, and/or better publication practices, there is good reason to prevent and minimize the need for them. A variety of “authorized” agents can correct the literature. They can include authors, editors, publishers or journal owners, legal counsel, and representatives from the institution or organization where the work was produced (e.g., department heads, deans, or laboratory directors). The primary methods used for correcting the literature are errata and retractions, whereas expressions of concern are used to raise awareness to a possible problem in an article.

Why Correcting the Literature with Errata and Retractions is Good Medical Practice?