English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Scientific journals are designed to communicate primary scientific research and are committed to maintain high standards in order to keep the integrity of the scientific record. The editor-in-chief and the editorial board of a scientific journal are responsible for the entire content of a scientific journal, and it is their responsibility to evaluate the quality and the validity of submitted manuscripts with due respect to the stated aims and standards of their journals. After editorial and peer review, the editor-in-chief ultimately decides whether manuscripts can be published or not. Usually, the editor sends manuscripts for review to independent experts who are not part of the editorial board. Papers may also be rejected without external review, which is at the discretion of the editor. However, there are unfortunately many scientific journals around that do not undertake editorial or peer reviews and at the same time ask for a publication fee (so-called predatory publishing). The Journal Evaluation Tool may be a helpful tool to determine whether a scientific journal is a credible publication source (Rele et al. 2017). However, based on my long-standing experience as editor-in-chief of ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, there are two editorial difficulties that affect the quality and credibility of published work in scientific journals:

Editors must be vigilant to guarantee the quality and credibility of published scientific work