English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BReproducibility, reproducibility, reproducibility ,̂ like the real estate mantra Blocation, location, location^, is fast becoming a point ofmajor emphasis with scientific funding agencies. Given the importance of the concept of reproducibility in the scientific method, it can a little surprising to some that such a fundamental concept has become such a problem that it needs to be mantrafied. Without delving again into how we got to this problem (it has been well documented in other places), it is worth recounting one of the mantras that has come before, namely, Bpublish, publish, publish^ (and it’s corollary Bpublish or perish^). Historically, researchers have done a fabulous job of writing papers (and getting the attendant perks of grants and promotions). The translation of research findings into clinical benefits to society, however, particularly in some areas, has been less exceptional In the quest to make the research article more reproducible, Neuroinformatics has led the way in a number of initiatives. Promoting data and software publication and requirement for an inclusion of an Information Sharing Statement (ISS) are examples of these initiatives. Originally optional, and later becoming required, the ISS was designed to provide an explicit statement of if, how, and where the data, software, model and other resources used in a publication were available. While not requiring that these resources be available, the ISS required the availability of these resources to be documented, thereby attempting to exert some subtle pressure when resources were not available or only available ‘upon request’, practices that have been documented to have a rather poor track record for actual successful resource sharing. The time for subtlety, however, is over. Authors, journals, funders, reviewers, publishers, etc. must continue to take all elements of reproducibility even more seriously. Starting in 2018, for all articles appearing in Neuroinformatics we will require the following: data used must be reposited in a domainappropriate repository with the minimum necessary barriers to access by others; and software used must be accessible from an appropriate distribution system and documented by version. Unique identifiers (RRID, DOI, accession numbers, etc.) as well as literature citation should be used to explicitly document all resources used in the publication. The sufficiency of a submission in meeting these mandates is to be evaluated and adjudicated by the reviewers and editors

The Information Sharing Statement Grows Some Teeth