English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We shed light on the structure of the “three-operator” version of the forward-Douglas–Rachford splitting algorithm for finding a zero of a sum of maximally monotone operators \(A + B + C\), where B is cocoercive, involving only the computation of B and of the resolvent of A and of C, separately. We show that it is a straightforward extension of a fixed-point algorithm proposed by us as a generalization of the forward–backward splitting algorithm, initially designed for finding a zero of a sum of an arbitrary number of maximally monotone operators \(\sum _{i=1}^n A_i + B\), where B is cocoercive, involving only the computation of B and of the resolvent of each \(A_i\) separately. We argue that, the former is the “true” forward-Douglas–Rachford splitting algorithm, in contrast to the initial use of this designation in the literature. Then, we highlight the extension to an arbitrary number of maximally monotone operators in the splitting, \(\sum _{i=1}^{n} A_i + B + C\), in a formulation admitting preconditioning operators. We finally demonstate experimentally its interest in the context of nonsmooth convex optimization.

A note on the forward-Douglas–Rachford splitting for monotone inclusion and convex optimization