English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Michael Walzer’s BThe Question of Risk^ is a brief but important essay, presenting critical questions about the war on terrorism and answering them on grounds of his general conception. Some of Walzer’s statements relate directly to previous essays of our own in which we proposed an ethical doctrine in the context of fighting terrorism. We are going to respond to Walzer’s claims about the issues under consideration and use this opportunity to clarify some parts of our doctrine. In our previous essays, we discussed the central issue to which fighting terrorism gives rise, namely terrorists operating from within a population not directly involved in terrorist activity. Walzer confers primacy on this issue, calling it Bthe core issue... How much risk must our soldiers take to reduce the risks they impose on civilians when they respond to attacks [from the midst of... civilian population]?^. Philosophia (2016) 44:295–308 DOI 10.1007/s11406-016-9736-5

Human Life in the War on Terrorism: a Response to “the Risk Dilemma” by Michael Walzer