English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

With the proliferation of large-scale knowledge graphs (KGs), multi-hop knowledge graph reasoning has been a capstone that enables machines to be able to handle intelligent tasks, especially where some explicit reasoning path is appreciated for decision making. To train a KG reasoner, supervised learning-based methods suffer from false-negative issues, i.e., unseen paths during training are not to be found in prediction; in contrast, reinforcement learning (RL)-based methods do not require labeled paths, and can explore to cover many appropriate reasoning paths. In this connection, efforts have been dedicated to investigating several RL formulations for multi-hop KG reasoning. Particularly, current RL-based methods generate rewards at the very end of the reasoning process, due to which short paths of hops less than a given threshold are likely to be overlooked, and the overall performance is impaired. To address the problem, we propose , a revised RL formulation of multi-hop KG reasoning that is characterized by two novel designs—the stop signal and the worth-trying signal. The stop signal instructs the agent of RL to stay at the entity after finding the answer, preventing from hopping further even if the threshold is not reached; meanwhile, the worth-trying signal encourages the agent to try to learn some partial patterns from the paths that fail to lead to the answer. To validate the design of our model , comprehensive experiments are carried out on three benchmark knowledge graphs, and the results and analysis suggest the superiority of  over state-of-the-art methods.

To hop or not, that is the question: Towards effective multi-hop reasoning over knowledge graphs