English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study evaluated the morphology and immunohistochemistry of 85 canine cutaneous histiocytic tumours. The tumours were classified morphologically as either canine cutaneous histiocytomas (71 tumours) or canine cutaneous histiocytic sarcomas (14 tumours). The immunohistochemical analysis was conducted on paraffin sections using an antibody panel (against MHCII, CD18, CD79αcy, CD3 and E-cadherin). Histochemical staining with toluidine blue and Gomori silver impregnation was also performed. A follow-up was conducted via surveys. The histiocytic origin of the tumour cells was confirmed in 65 of the canine cutaneous histiocytomas and in 4 of the canine cutaneous histiocytic sarcomas. The tumours that had been misdiagnosed as canine cutaneous histiocytomas included plasmacytomas, epitheliotropic T-cell lymphomas and undetermined entities. The tumours misdiagnosed as canine cutaneous histiocytic sarcomas included plasmacytomas and non-epitheliotropic T-cell lymphomas, but the majority of them remained undetermined. The canine cutaneous histiocytomas showed MHCII, CD18 and E-cadherin expression, but in several of the tumours, the expression of CD18 or E-cadherin was confirmed in only a small percentage of the tumour cells. The regressing canine cutaneous histiocytomas showed increased T- and B-lymphocyte infiltration, a decreased mitotic index, transport of the MHCII molecules from the cytoplasm to the cell membrane and loss of E-cadherin expression in the tumour cells. The canine cutaneous histiocytic sarcomas showed both high morphological diversity and expression of MHCII and CD18. Two of the evaluated histiocytic sarcomas also showed expression of E-cadherin. In conclusion, immunohistochemistry, including analysis of MHCII, CD18 and the lymphocytic markers CD3 and CD79, should be performed for the diagnosis of canine cutaneous histiocytic tumours. The expression of E-cadherin in canine cutaneous histiocytic sarcomas suggests an origin of the tumour cells among Langerhans cells.

Morphology and immunophenotype of canine cutaneous histiocytic tumours with particular emphasis on diagnostic application