English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper, we take a fresh look at three Popperian concepts: riskiness,falsifiability, and truthlikeness (or verisimilitude) of scientific hypothesesor theories. First, we make explicit the dimensions that underlie the notion ofriskiness. Secondly, we examine if and how degrees of falsifiability can bedefined, and how they are related to various dimensions of the concept ofriskiness as well as the experimental context. Thirdly, we consider therelation of riskiness to (expected degrees of) truthlikeness. Throughout, wepay special attention to probabilistic theories and we offer a tentative,quantitative account of verisimilitude for probabilistic theories.

Degrees of riskiness, falsifiability, and truthlikeness. A neo-Popperian account applicable to probabilistic theories