English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the context of the Sleeping Beauty problem, it has been argued thatso-called "halfers" can avoid Dutch book arguments by adopting evidentialdecision theory. I introduce a Dutch book for a variant of the Sleeping Beautyproblem and argue that evidential decision theorists fall prey to it, whetherthey are halfers or thirders. The argument crucially requires that an actioncan provide evidence for what the agent would do not only at other decisionpoints where she has exactly the same information, but also at decision pointswhere she has different but "symmetric" information.

A Dutch Book against Sleeping Beauties Who Are Evidential Decision Theorists