English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article aims to analyze the semantic fields of two Korean terms in the field of a specialized judicial terminology, i.e.  court  and  tribunal , which are usually reflected in English by one hypernym term  court . This analysis, although carried out on limited Korean data, is intended to indicate the differences between the use of these two different Korean terms and to indicate the reasons why  court  is currently the most common English equivalent. At the same time, the author, by pointing to the historical and cultural background, explains the reasons why the term  court  is not always correct. The methods used in compiling the data are to highlight differences in the semantics of Korean terms covered by an English hypernym  court .

Analysis of the Semantic Scope of Two Korean Terms Equivalent to English Court