English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

During the current century, each major coronavirus outbreak has triggered aquick surge of academic publications on this topic. The spike in researchpublications following the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19), however, has beenlike no other. The global crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has mobilisedscientific efforts in an unprecedented way. In less than five months, more than12,000 research items have been indexed while the number increasing every day.With the crisis affecting all aspects of life, research on Covid-19 seems tohave become a focal point of interest across many academic disciplines. Here,scientometric aspects of the Covid-19 literature are analysed and contrastedwith those of the two previous major Coronavirus diseases, i.e. SARS and MERS.The focus is on the co-occurrence of key-terms, bibliographic coupling andcitation relations of journals and collaborations between countries. Certainrecurring patterns across all three literatures were discovered. All threeoutbreaks have commonly generated three distinct and major cohort of studies:(i) studies linked to the public health response and epidemic control, (ii)studies associated with the chemical constitution of the virus and (iii)studies related to treatment, vaccine and clinical care. While studiesaffiliated with the category (i) seem to have been the first to emerge, theyoverall received least numbers of citations compared to those of the two othercategories. Covid-19 studies seem to have been distributed across a broadervariety of journals and subject areas. Clear links are observed between thegeographical origins of each outbreak or the local geographical severity ofeach outbreak and the magnitude of research originated from regions. Covid-19studies also display the involvement of authors from a broader variety ofcountries compared to SARS and MRS.

scientometrics

Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly  efforts prompted by a health crisis: Scientometric comparisons across SARS,  MERS and 2019-nCov literature