English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The prediction of the long-term impact of a scientific article is challengingtask, addressed by the bibliometrician through resorting to a proxy whosereliability increases with the breadth of the citation window. In the nationalresearch assessment exercises using metrics the citation window is necessarilyshort, but in some cases is sufficient to advise the use of simple citations.For the Italian VQR 2011-2014, the choice was instead made to adopt a linearweighted combination of citations and journal metric percentiles, with weightsdifferentiated by discipline and year. Given the strategic importance of theexercise, whose results inform the allocation of a significant share ofresources for the national academic system, we examined whether the predictivepower of the proposed indicator is stronger than the simple citation count. Theresults show the opposite, for all discipline in the sciences and a citationwindow above two years.

scientometrics

Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to  grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment  exercise (VQR 2011-2014)