English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this study, we compare the difference in the impact between open access(OA) and non-open access (non-OA) articles. 1761 Nature Communications articlespublished from 1 Jan. 2012 to 31 Aug. 2013 are selected as our researchobjects, including 587 OA articles and 1174 non-OA articles. Citation data anddaily updated article-level metrics data are harvested directly from theplatform of nature.com. Data is analyzed from the static versustemporal-dynamic perspectives. The OA citation advantage is confirmed, and theOA advantage is also applicable when extending the comparing from citation toarticle views and social media attention. More important, we find that OApapers not only have the great advantage of total downloads, but also have thefeature of keeping sustained and steady downloads for a long time. For articledownloads, non-OA papers only have a short period of attention, when theadvantage of OA papers exists for a much longer time.

The Open Access Advantage Considering Citation, Article Usage and Social Media Attention