English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

We compare several topologies on the Morse boundary $\partial_M Y$ of a$\mathrm{CAT(0)}$ cube complex $Y$. In particular, we show that the twotopologies introduced by Cashen and Mackay are not equal in general and providea new description of one of them in the language of cube complexes. As acorollary, we obtain a new approach to tackle the question whether the visualtopology induces a quasi-isometry-invariant topology on the Morse boundary.This leads to an obstruction to quasi-isometry-invariance in terms of thebehaviour of geodesics under quasi-isometries.

Comparing topologies on the Morse boundary and quasi-isometry invariance