English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In Crull (2015) it is argued that, in order to confront outstanding problemsin cosmology and quantum gravity, interpretational aspects of quantum theorycan by bypassed because decoherence is able to resolve them. As a result, Crull(2015) concludes that our focus on conceptual and interpretational issues,while dealing with such matters in Okon and Sudarsky (2014), is avoidable andeven pernicious. Here we will defend our position by showing in detail whydecoherence does not help in the resolution of foundational questions inquantum mechanics, such as the measurement problem or the emergence ofclassicality.

Less Decoherence and More Coherence in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Elsewhere