English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It was pointed out in the first part of this study that EPR-type entanglementis defined by the possibility of performing any of two mutually incompatibledistant, i. e.,direct-interaction-free, measurements. They go together underthe term 'EPR-type disentanglement'. In this second part, quantum-mechanicalinsight is gained in the real random delayed-choice erasure experiment of Kimet al. [Kim et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1-5 (2000)] by a relative-reality-of-unitarily-evolving-state (RRUES) approach (explained in the first part).Finally, it is shown that this remarkable experiment, which performs, by randomchoice, two incompatible measurements at the same time, is actually an EPR-typedisentanglement experiment, closely related to the micromaser experimentdiscussed in the first part.

On EPR-type Entanglement in the Experiments of Scully et Al. II. Insight in the Real Random Delayed-choice Erasure Experiment