English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Flooding is one of the major natural hazards in the UK. Accurate flood estimation at ungauged catchment is an important component to understand and mitigate flood hazards, but still a difficult issue. This study therefore attempts to explore and improve an index flood estimation model, known as the FEH-QMED model, popular in the UK. It was developed under the assumption that the index flood of QMED, i.e., the median of the set of annual maximum (AMAX) flood data, standing for a flooding level of 2-year return period, can be explained by catchment descriptors. In this study, two fundamentals are empirically explored, including assessing reliability of the nonlinear functional impacts of the catchment descriptors on the logarithmic transformation of QMED, specified by the FEH-QMED model, and the potential to improve the model for more accurate index flood estimation, based on the flooding data of 586 gauged stations across the UK. Through a spatial additive regression analysis, we empirically find that the nonlinear impacts of the catchment descriptors in an updated FEH-QMED model appear reliable. However, spatial correlation tests including Moran’s I and Lagrange multiplier tests show that strong spatial dependence exists in the residuals of, but was not fully taken into account by, the QMED type models. We have therefore empirically established new spatial index flood estimation models by proposing spatial autoregressive models to model the impacts of the neighboring sites. Cross-validation assessments demonstrate that the suggested spatial error-based index flood model outperforms the updated FEH-QMED model with a significant improvement, which is robust in the sense of different error measures, say by a reduction of 13.8% of the mean squared error of prediction, for the UK index flood estimation.

Estimating the UK Index Flood: an Improved Spatial Flooding Analysis