English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Emphasizing the knowledge gaps and the continuing need for more regulatory research both in the food industries and other domains, we would like to conclude our introductory editorial by quoting some words of Braithwaite et al. (2007:4) that have already inspired our endeavours as editors: "[…] we should not be surprised that innovations in networked regulation capture the imagination of big thinkers and practical doers alike about the direction the world is heading. […] we see the promotion of better regulatory studies as a worthy way of understanding and improving the world around us. Bad regulation, after all, can do terrible damage to people. Good regulation can control problems […]. Regulation matters, and therefore the development and empirical testing of theories about regulation also matter. Because regulation and regulatory studies make a crucial difference in the lives of millions of people, all of us in the intellectual community of regulatory scholars need to become more demanding than we have been about theoretical rigor and empirical evidence."

Food safety and network governance structure of the agri-food system