English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The thermal stability of Ru–Re NPs on γ-alumina support was studied in hydrogen at 800 °C and in air at 250–400 °C. The catalysts were synthesized using Cl-free and Cl-containing Ru precursors and NH 4 ReO 4 . Very high sintering resistance of Ru–Re NPs was found in hydrogen atmosphere and independent of Ru precursors and Re loading, the size of them was below 2–3 nm. In air, metal segregation occurred at 250 °C, leading to formation of RuO 2  and highly dispersed ReO x  species. Ruthenium agglomeration was hindered at higher Re loading and in presence of residual Cl species. Propane oxidation rate was higher with the Ru(N)–Re catalysts than with Ru(N) and that containing Cl species. The Ru(N)–Re (3:1) catalyst exhibited the highest activity and the lowest activation energy (91.6 kJ mol −1 ) what is in contrast to Ru(Cl)–Re (3:1) which had the lowest activity and the highest activation energy (119.3 kJ mol −1 ). Thus, the synergy effect was not observed in Cl-containing catalysts. Graphic Abstract

Thermal Stability of Ru–Re NPs in H2 and O2 Atmosphere and Their Activity in VOCs Oxidation: Effect of Ru Precursor