English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this study was to investigate whether medium-term hospital resource use differed between ambulatory and inpatient laparoscopy surgery for benign gynaecological conditions. Patient-based costing data were collected through a randomised controlled trial involving 26 inpatients and 40 day-surgery patients. The perspective was that of the hospital gynaecological ward. Day surgery was significantly cheaper per patient than was inpatient surgery, mainly due to shorter operation times and lower hotel costs. Remedial surgery had a higher total cost than did evaluative surgery, but patient age, referral source and diagnosis, and surgeon seniority had no significant impact. Based on previous findings that ambulatory and inpatient surgery result in equivalent clinical outcomes, day surgery for benign gynaecological laparoscopy is cheaper and thus should be preferred to inpatient surgery.

A cost-minimisation analysis of inpatient versus day surgery for gynaecological laparoscopy